Parents’ anti-corporal-punishment views qualified as protected philosophical convictions under the ECHR

Evidence

The landmark ECHR judgment finding no violation of Article 3 (threat of corporal punishment insufficient without actual administration) but a violation of Article 2 of Protocol 1 (parental right to education in conformity with philosophical convictions). Established the “philosophical convictions” concept in ECHR jurisprudence — views worthy of respect in a democratic society, not incompatible with human dignity — and found that anti-corporal-punishment convictions qualified, compelling the UK to abolish school corporal punishment in state schools. — , The Rod and the Child, 11175

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Childism extends child-liberation ethics into mainstream philosophy — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 3398; Parental-rights arguments against school corporal punishment leave unprotected children of non-objecting parents — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 9210; School corporal punishment abolition in Britain stemmed from parental rights, not children’s rights holdings — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 9243 (+3 more)

Broader Connections