Palmerston’s hostility to Mehmed Ali stemmed from commercial rivalry fears

Evidence

The reason why Palmerston was so adamantly opposed to Mehmed Ali, Marsot believes, was the Pasha’s economic policies which Palmerston viewed with suspicion since British goods were barred from Egyptian markets as well as from other areas under the Pasha’s rule. In other words, while enumerating other potential reasons for Palmerston’s opposition to Mehmed Ali, Marsot argues that it was mostly the fear that “Muhammad Ali could well become a tiresome [commercial] rival” to the British that caused Palmerston’s venomous hostility to the Pasha leading to the latter’s eventual “undoing.” — Khaled Fahmy, All the Pasha_s Men_ Mehmed Ali, his…, 98

Categorization

Category: Factual Claims

• XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s interest in Ottoman Pashas and British Lords — the Palmerston/Mehmed Ali conflict is central.

Related

• Palmerston opposed Arab independence only because it would dismember Turkey. (similarity 0.85)
• Fear of Russian influence, not trade loss, drove Palmerston against Mehmed Ali (similarity 0.83)
• Britain opposed Mehmed Ali because his expansion threatened British India and Istanbul influence (similarity 0.82)
• Fear of Russian expansion, not lost Mediterranean markets, drove Palmerston’s opposition to Mehmed Ali (similarity 0.82)
• Palmerston saw Mehmed Ali’s monopolies as the lever to cripple his army (similarity 0.82)
• Palmerston weighed French influence in Egypt against Ottoman survival when choosing sides. (similarity 0.82)
• Fear of Russian expansion toward India, not lost markets, drove Palmerston’s opposition. (similarity 0.82)
• Britain opposed Ali because his expansion risked Russian interference in its Asian possessions (similarity 0.81)
• Palmerston opposed an Arab kingdom only because it meant dismembering Turkey (similarity 0.81)
• British hostility targeted Mehmed Ali’s expansion, not his industrialization or trade (similarity 0.81)
• Mehmed Ali cooperated with British coaling requests yet Palmerston distrusted him (similarity 0.79)
• British hostility to Mehmed Ali came from his military expansion, not his domestic reforms. (similarity 0.79)
• British hostility targeted the Pasha’s imperial expansion, not his industrialization (similarity 0.79)
• Mehmed Ali initially expected to fight Persia for the Sultan, not the Morea. (similarity 0.78)
• Husrev Pasha, not the Sultan or Britain, was Mehmed Ali’s chief adversary (similarity 0.78)