Ownership in place-based programs grows from multi-sector institutional partnerships

Evidence

The first principle is: Maximize ownership through partnerships. Each CO-SEED site winds up being a partnership between a higher education institution, schools, diverse community organizations, and an environmental learning center. The community organizations may be the historical society, the conservation commission, the department of transportation, or the planning board. Environmental centers may be the zoo, a local trails group, or a regional nature center. — David Sobel, Place-Based Education, 13

Categorization

• XREF: Partnership architecture maps onto the reader’s polyad interest in institutions as shapers of place practice. — connects to: Deciding grant awards together is itself a team-building and learning exercise. — David Sobel, Place-Based Education: Connecting…, 38; Durable community-school change appears abruptly after years of slow accumulation. — David Sobel, Place-Based Education: Connecting…, 119; Effective place-based education runs on community partnerships and genuine student projects. — David Sobel, Place-Based Education: Connecting…, 13 (+4 more)

Related

• Effective place-based education runs on community partnerships and genuine student projects. (similarity 0.87)

Broader Connections

• External institutional incentives can align interests with commitments #corroborates (0.80) — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 167
• Institutionalized space appropriation produces territorially bounded social solidarity #expands (0.78) — David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity, 1395
• Pre-existing institutional strength determined whether aggregation improved project outcomes #qualifies (0.75) — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 118
• Community-driven development institutions do not spill over into everyday community governance #complicates (0.72) — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 145