Ordoliberals saw the economic constitution as imposed by deliberate political will from above

Evidence

Böhm described it as “a normative order of the national economy” that must come into being through the exercise of a “conscious and aware po­liti­cal ­will, an authoritative decision of leadership.” He used martial meta­phors that are worth quoting at length, declaring that “­there is no longer any space for a ­silent growth, for an orderly formation of ­things out of the lap of the economy itself, that is, from the bottom up. Social Babels built of such ­great height and at such an accelerated tempo produce an unholy confusion of languages ­unless the idea of order that alone can represent the ele­ment of unity illuminates the totality down to its last details, ­unless the idea of order is based on the sentence: every­thing at my command!” — Quinn Slobodian, Globalists, 697

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Clarifies the ordoliberal concept of the economic constitution as an authoritative, top-down decision rather than an emergent growth.
  • XREF: Connects to Carl Schmitt’s constitutional theory and its influence on postwar German ordoliberalism. — connects to: Ordoliberalism inverted classical liberalism by making economic effectiveness depend on political and legal systems — Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous…, 362; Austerity reforms embed budget-balancing mandates into constitutions. — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 378; Ordoliberal ‘economic constitution’ meant a normative vision, not a founding legal document. — Quinn Slobodian, Globalists: The End of Empire and the…, 696 (+7 more)
  • ADDENDUM: The top-down imposition of economic order parallels the deliberate institutional design in the Milgrom law-merchant material.

Broader Connections