Ordinary grammar’s linear subject-copula-predicate structure blocks genuine speculative thought

Evidence

When the predicative proposition, the traditional subject and source for philosophy, becomes a speculative proposition, it confers on the λγς its real incline, thus successfully bringing the idea of συµα νειν into the context of predication. As long as it remains within the tradition, philosophy cannot, in Hegel’s view, get past basic grammar. It fails to see the constitutive incline of the proposition, because no matter what philosophy says, it still sees the proposition as a straight course protecting itself from a fall to which it claims to be exposed. Captive to a linear conception which keeps subject, copula and predicate within a relation but alien to one another, traditional philosophy fails to forge a necessary foundation for the relation between the subject and its accidents. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 1172

Categorization

  • XREF: Extends the prior chapter thread on the speculative proposition form versus ordinary grammar (see prior summaries about the proposition’s plastic operation). — connects to: Speculative philosophy emerges when thought renounces rigid partition and opens to nature — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 989; Grammar is the alphabet of the spiritual realm and the content of logic — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1145; Speculative thought arises inside the proposition rather than through a separate form — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1139 (+11 more)
  • DEFINE: Clarifies what distinguishes a speculative from a merely predicative proposition: the constitutive ‘incline’ (inclinaison) and Greek syn-semainein entering predication.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1172

Broader Connections