Ordinary Egyptians, not Gordon, actually administered the Sudan on the ground

Evidence

The Egyptian colonial experience in the Sudan was an encounter that took place in two territories: in the Sudan and in Egypt itself (just as Egyptian travelers to Europe reexperienced a sense of empire). It is true that the administration of the Sudan was known as the Turkïya by generations of Sudanese, because the Sudan initially had been conquered by Turkish- speaking officers for Muhammad Alï (also known as Mehemet Alï), the Albanian Ottoman officer who was acting as a governor of Egypt for the Ottoman Empire in the early nineteenth century. But the characterization of the administration as Turkish by people unfamiliar with the ethnic nuances of Egypt’s population also disguises the fact that native-born, Arabic-speaking Egyptians participated in the colony’s administration, more prominently as decades passed and the administration strengthened its roots. — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 56 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

The expedition was an act of empire, mimicking acts of other empires— but in the name of which empire? Here lies the mystery. Although the expedition brought great glory to Egypt and to its ruler, it remains unclear how many native-born, Arabic-speaking Egyptians took part in the expedi- tion. Its leader himself was a Turkish-speaking officer, and his journal was not translated into Arabic until 1922. Some Egyptian historians, like Maq- qar, have claimed Selim Qapudan as an Egyptian pioneer or an Egyptianized hero. But this leads back to the opacity that continues to surround Muhammad Alï's African empire. Selim Qapudan endured the hardships of his voyages out of duty to Muhammad Alï, but which community was he claiming as his own? In the name of which nation, if any, was he exploring? — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 210 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

Broader Connections