Orchestral seating rearrangements change the stereo image listeners actually hear.

Evidence

The rather extraordinary string part writing in the final movement of Tchaikovsky’s 6th Symphony in the passage shown in Figure 5.15 is also often noted in this context because it is generally perceived as the four-part passage shown (track 67 on the accompanying CD). This can again be explained by the principle of grouping by frequency proximity. The effect would have been heard in terms of stereo listening by audiences of the day, since the strings were then positioned in the following order (audience view from left to right): first violins, double basses, cellos, violas and second violins. This is as opposed to the more common arrangement today (audience view from left to right): first violins, second violins, violas, double basses and cellos. — David M. Howard, Jamie Angus, Acoustics and Psychoacoustics, 1628

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Do period-performance orchestras restore the old viola/cello seating specifically to recover Tchaikovsky’s intended perceptual blending?
  • XREF: Connects psychoacoustic grouping principles to historical performance practice and orchestral seating history. — connects to: Reversing stereo channels or turning around can replicate hearing music from behind the orchestra — David M. Howard, Jamie Angus, Acoustics and Psychoacoustics, 1638; Off-center listeners lose the stereo illusion but retain musical content — Toole, Floyd E, Sound reproduction- the acoustics and…, 395; Orchestral seating aligns with a pitch-to-side perceptual bias in listeners. — David M. Howard, Jamie Angus, Acoustics and Psychoacoustics, 1632 (+17 more)

Broader Connections