Opponents can kill a reform by insisting on individual-case exceptions

Evidence

Each disputed case, the speakers were saying, should be decided on its individual merits by the Board’s Bureau of Standards and included as a separate item in the budget, a policy which would not only drag out the hearings indefinitely but would in itself defeat the principle of universal standardization. The Tammany members of the Board said that after careful consideration they didn’t see how any other policy could be adopted; humane considerations, fairness, justice—these must not be ignored. They were in favor of standardization, they said, they intended to adopt the Moses plan, but the plan must be modified where individual situations required it. Even pro-Fusion newspapers couldn’t find anything to criticize in that. — Robert A. Caro, The Power Broker, 352

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the general pattern in other sources where universalizing reforms (zoning, standardization, entitlements) get gutted via case-by-case exceptions — echoes Milgrom-style analysis that exceptions defeat principle. — connects to: Reform succeeds or dies depending on group tolerance of individual dissent. — Ambedkar, B R, Annihilation of Caste_ The Annotated…, 897; A reform organization could win respect for principle while losing every major fight — Robert A. Caro, The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the…, 583; Reform-minded dissent within a system strengthens rather than threatens it
  • DEFINE: Illustrates ā€˜death by a thousand exceptions’ as a political tactic — exceptions framed as humane obscuring their function as principle-killers.

Broader Connections