Operationalism restricts concepts to measurable operations, erasing transcendent meaning.

Evidence

The trend may be related to a development in scientific method: operationalism in the physical, behaviorism in the social sciences. The common feature is a total empiricism in the treatment of concepts; their meaning is restricted to the representation of particular operations and behavior. The operational point of view is well illustrated by P. W. Bridgman’s analysis of the concept of length: … We evidently know what we mean by length if we can tell what the length of any and every object is, and for the physicist nothing more is required. To find the length of an object, we have to perform certain physical operations. The concept of length is therefore fixed when the operations by which length is measured are fixed: that is, the concept of length involves as much and nothing more than the set of operations by which length is determined. In general, we mean by any concept nothing more than a set of operations; the concept is synonymous with the corresponding set of operations. — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man, 132

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Precisely defines operationalism via Bridgman’s length example — the methodological mechanism behind one-dimensional thought.
  • XREF: connects to: Operational concepts miss the determining facts and thereby sustain ideology — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the…, 460; The operational concept becomes false by atomizing facts within the repressive whole — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the…, 430; Limitation implies transcendence because the limiting being relates to what it excludes — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 869 (+4 more)

Broader Connections