Online participation follows the same winner-take-all hierarchy the old media had

Evidence

[Clay Shirky’s] analysis showed that the blogosphere wasn’t a smooth ball where everyone had an equal voice. Rather, it was dominated by a handful of sites that pulled enormous numbers, followed by a looooo­ooooo­ng tail of sites with a few followers. The old pernicious topology had reasserted itself. We should have known that it would, and it took a while for the miserable fact to sink in. — Tim Wu, The Attention Merchants, 967

Categorization

  • XREF: Reverses the early egalitarian expectations of Web 2.0 and connects to the broader recurring pattern in this book of each new attention medium reproducing the older hierarchy. — connects to: Traditional media are institutionalized and gatekept while social media are accessible and reciprocal; The internet amplifies existing political power rather than transforming it — W. David Marx, Blank Space: A Cultural History of the…, 489; Online communities reproduce status hierarchies that limit who can participate — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 173 (+2 more)
  • QUESTION: Shirky’s analysis — worth chasing down what data or study this came from to cite precisely.

Broader Connections