One psychology book on prejudice remained the fieldās most cited work for fifty years
Evidence
Allportās ideas foreshadowed many of the ānewā developments in the ļ¬eld, and his book has provided a scholarly foundation for generations of students, teachers, and scholars in this area. In the 25th anniversary edition of the book (1954/1979), Kenneth Clark wrote in the preface, āAs is generally recognized, The Nature of Prejudice is a classic. Its table of contents establishes the parameters for a scholarly social science approach to the discussion and understanding of this complex human problemā (p. ix). In the introduction to the same volume, Thomas Pettigrew concurred, āThe table of contents ⦠has in fact organized the scholarly study of the important concept of prejudice. The Nature of Prejudice delineated the area of study, set up its basic categories and problems, and cast it in a broad, eclectic framework that remains todayā (p. xiii). As you will see from the chapters in this volume, The Nature of Prejudice remains a classic at its 50th anniversary, and Allportās ideas have inļ¬uenced scholars in the ļ¬eld as much over the past 25 years as they did in the bookās ļ¬rst 25 years. ā John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 88 (
#expands, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Allportās book organized the scholarly study of prejudice for 50 years ā John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Yearsā¦, 88; Allportās table of contents structured fifty years of prejudice research ā John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Yearsā¦, 91; A single Allport chapter seeded the modern field of prejudice target research ā John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Yearsā¦, 926
Broader Connections
- Allportās book organized the scholarly study of prejudice for 50 years
#expands(0.97) ā John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 88