Northern-educated Southern leaders internalize the view that their own cultures are inferior

Evidence

So, when they learn math and science and history, they also learn Northern/modern assumptions about what kinds of scientific information to trust, what kinds of research and data really matter, which traditions are valuable, and which are simply ā€œbehind.ā€ All of these ideas of what constitutes cultural and economic ā€œadvancementā€ rely on specific dualized and hierarchized metaphors (advanced/behind, developed/ undeveloped, for example) and are part of the overarching discourse of modernity, in particularly the discourse of ā€œprogress.ā€ These fundamental discourses created the hierarchized thinking that made colonization possible. — Rebecca A. Martusewicz, Jeff Edmundson, and John Lupinacci, EcoJustice Education, 1380

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly opposes the ā€˜autonomous thinking self is a fiction; mind is relational’ claim from ch9 and the metaphor-as-thought work in ch10. — connects to: Adopting the colonizer’s language signals an intensified inferiority complex among the educated — Frantz Fanon, Constance Farrington, Black skin, white masks, 97; Radical Western ideologies recruited educated non-white elites by assuaging inferiority — Cedric J. Robinson, Black Marxism_ The Making of the Black…, 1411; Western-educated Southern elites end up belonging to no culture at all — Rebecca A. Martusewicz, Jeff Edmundson, and John Lupinacci, EcoJustice Education: Toward Diverse,…, 1383 (+4 more)
  • SEED: Angle for an essay: how exported Western schooling functions as soft colonization by re-educating future Southern leaders, mirroring boarding schools’ cultural genocide.

Broader Connections