New mysterianism proposes that the hard problem of consciousness cannot be resolved by humans.

Evidence

New mysterianism (Wikipedia)

corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim
XREF: connects to: Human knowledge fails to answer life’s fundamental questions. — Leo Tolstoy, A Confession, 64; Science has failed to adequately answer how human consciousness developed or what it actually is. — No, Science Can’t Answer the Biggest Questions of Life and Existence; Human knowledge is limited and cannot answer why the universe exists or the purpose of life. — Science, Faith, and the Limits of Human Knowledge (+5 more)

Colin McGinn argues consciousness is a mystery that human intelligence will never unravel, as the hard problem of qualia cannot be resolved by humans. (similarity 0.90)
Reductionists accept only ‘temporary mysterianism’—current ignorance about consciousness that future science may resolve—versus ‘permanent mysterianism,’ which claims the mystery is unsolvable. (similarity 0.84)
Science has failed to adequately answer how human consciousness developed or what it actually is. (similarity 0.81)
Consciousness presents a ‘hard problem’ to scholars — how the physical body gives rise to subjective experience. (similarity 0.81)
Understanding consciousness requires not treating organisms like machines and minds like code. (similarity 0.80)
Claiming we may never fully understand phenomena differs from claiming they can never be explained physically, and the explanatory gap is narrowing daily. (similarity 0.79)
The hard problem of consciousness is explaining why any physical state is conscious rather than nonconscious. (similarity 0.79)
Science is done by brains and people, so claiming science can’t explain consciousness is nonsensical. (similarity 0.78)