New and classic conspiracism share urgency but differ fundamentally.

Evidence

The new conspiracist mind-set shares much with classic conspiracy theory. Both assume that things are not as they seem: malignant forces are at work beneath the surface. Both insist that right now is the critical saving moment, so with any delay in exposing the nefarious design all could be lost. Both are a grim business. They warn of danger and they are themselves dangerous. But the differences outweigh the commonalities. β€” Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum, A Lot of People Are Saying, 51

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: New conspiracism differs from classic conspiracy theory in kind β€” Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum, A Lot of People Are Saying: The New…, 185; Classic conspiracism defends ultimate values while new conspiracism lacks scale β€” Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum, A Lot of People Are Saying: The New…, 70; New conspiracism abandons evidence while classic conspiracism theorizes it (+6 more)

Broader Connections