Neoliberals pathologised political struggle by framing the market as peaceful and politics as violent

Evidence

I argue that, in promoting a dichotomy between the market as a realm of mutually beneficial, free, peaceful exchange, and politics as violent, coercive and militaristic, the neoliberals sought to inculcate the morals of the market and pathologise those political struggles which threatened the assigned places of postcolonial societies in the international division of labour. — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market, 64

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Articulates the core market/politics dichotomy that structures the book’s argument.
  • XREF: Connects to Marx’s critique of bourgeois political economy and to Polanyi’s double movement; also resonates with the reader’s work on human-rights discourse and market ethics. — connects to: Neoliberalism’s internal contradictions are displaced onto cultural theaters of cruelty — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 366; The crisis narrative blaming government interference absorbed leftwing grievances to defend market orthodoxy — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 496; Neoliberals diagnosed intellectual hostility to markets as resentment, utopianism, and ignorance. — Dieter Plehwe, Quinn Slobodian & Philip Mirowski (eds.), Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, 286 (+12 more)

Broader Connections