Nativism’s victory in 1924 threatened its own survival by removing its threat

Evidence

Yet a final word remains to be said. To leave the nativists on the crest of the wave that had borne them upward for a generation would be false to the longer rhythms of American history. ‘The nativists had won, indeed, a culminating victory. But they could not savor it for long without vitiating their own spirit and values. Nativism lived through compulsive anxiety and sleepless vigilance; it could not afford to relax. In 1924 it faced a peril to itself graver than any foreign influence: an inner sense of relief. — John Higham, Strangers in the Land, 1952

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: Higham’s paradox — a solidarity built on manufactured external threat is self-vitiating once it succeeds, because it needs compulsive anxiety to live — is central to the reader’s core question about what happens when the enemy disappears.
  • XREF: Directly bears on the reader’s question of whether threat-hardened solidarity decays or manufactures a new enemy when the threat vanishes. — connects to: The removal of economic threat deflated nativism regardless of rising immigration — John Higham, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of…, 618; Nativism abandoned ideological conversion for permanent racial exclusion once radical threat dissolved — John Higham, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of…, 1580; Nativist ideology outlived its emotional drive after 1924. — John Higham, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of…, 1960 (+4 more)

Broader Connections