National museums omit annihilated groups, erasing their claim to the nation

Evidence

There is no history, one might say, without remembrance: no history of or for those not remembered, whose past is not made present, whose past is deemed to have no presence. There is no remembering of some pasts – of those not simply marginalized in a society but marginalized because of and through their pasts – then, and so no history (for them) either. And no history of and for them means their absence from the (ethno)national history that is taken to make up the society’s frame of reference, its sense of itself. The Museum of Ethnography in Budapest lists 23 or so ethnic groups in the history of Hungary, but not Jews. Jews are absent from the national narrative of Hungary, at least as told today by that national museum. This despite the fact that as late as the onset of 1944 there were approximately 750,000 Jews in Hungary, over 100,000 in Budapest alone. Today the Jewish population of Hungary is a mere 16,000, the rest largely annihilated by Nazis and their Hungarian supporters in that fateful final year of the Shoah. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 135

Categorization

  • QUESTION: The museum’s omission of ~750k pre-Shoah Jews while listing 23 ethnic groups is a concrete verifiable fact — worth checking whether this reflects an active erasure decision or simple neglect, which would bear on how institutional exclusion operates.
  • XREF: connects to: National narratives can erase the very groups they annihilated; Erasing a group’s past erases its claim on the nation-state; Plantation museums center objects and erase enslaved people from their narratives. — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 1896 (+9 more)

Broader Connections