Narrated exclusivity hardens over time into constitutive claims of positional superiority.
Evidence
The processes of narrating exclusivity and accumulating privileges develop with time and come to affect the individual and collective selves, as well as the belief system. As Lloyd’s Chapter 12 on Northern Ireland shows in reference to Ulster’s Unionists, “What begins then as no more than ‘an identification with British social and political institutions’ devolves into a constitutive claim to what Edward Said termed positional superiority.” — Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized, 114
Categorization
- XREF: A working answer to the threat-decay question: identity that starts as contingent institutional identification devolves over time into constitutive superiority — implying it does NOT decay when the original grounds fade, but re-grounds itself. — connects to: Explanations for group positions become justifications that make the status quo seem natural; Stereotypes harden when actively defended, not merely lazily deployed; Persistent inequality breeds new ideologies defending privileged positions across eras (+4 more)
- DEEPTHINKING: The Northern Ireland case offers a concrete longitudinal mechanism: a political/institutional identification that accretes into an essentialized claim of inherent superiority — showing how a non-religious attachment can become sacralized/constitutive.
Broader Connections
- Persistent inequality breeds new ideologies defending privileged positions across eras
#expands(0.88) - Explaining why groups occupy positions becomes a justification for keeping them there
#corroborates(0.88) - Explanations for group positions become justifications that make the status quo seem natural
#expands(0.85) - Western civilization legitimizes dominance by narrating itself as temporal superiority
#exemplifies(0.85) — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 281 - Stereotypes harden when actively defended, not merely lazily deployed
#expands(0.82) - Disparaging a lower-status group psychologically uplifts the higher-status group
#expands(0.78) — Sheldon Solomon, Jeff Greenberg, Tom Pyszczynski, The Worm at the Core, 236 - The stridency of asserted values varies inversely with their lived substance
#contradicts(0.75) — Theodor W. Adorno, The Culture Industry, 221