Mythic discourse systematically conceals its own origins and institutional basis

Evidence

It seems to me that, on the contrary, it is a discourse with a specific function. Its function 1s not so much to record the past or to speak of origins as to speak of right, to speak of power’s right. Basically, the story is a lesson in public right. — Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, 132 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

The inner validity, coherence, and objective significance of all sciences, technologies, and arts are completely independent of the fact that they are realized within and find their preconditions in a social life, just as independent as their objective sense is of the psychological processes through which their discoverers found them. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 210 (#contradicts, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Origin myths function as political arguments about power, not historical records — Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, 132; Founding myths substitute fabricated narrative for genuine history to serve ruling classes; Assertions of scholarly objectivity mask the partisan premises of Orientalist discourse. (+14 more)

Broader Connections