Muslim religious leadership is split between progressive and literal readings of corporal punishment

Evidence

The contemporary Muslim institutional-religious-leadership engagement with the corporal-disciplinary question is operationally divided. The contemporary Tunisian, Moroccan, Egyptian-Azhar, Indonesian-Nahdlatul-Ulama-and-Muhammadiyah, and Turkish-Diyanet-Işleri-Başkanlığı engagement variously articulates moderate-to-progressive interpretation. The Saudi-state-affiliated Salafī-Hanbali engagement retains literal engagement with the seven-and-ten Hadith. The contemporary Iranian-Islamist engagement articulates the Jaʿfari synthesis that Episode 47 documented. — , The Rod and the Child, 3724

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Episode 47’s JaĘżfari synthesis and the broader SalafÄ«-Hanbali vs progressive jurisprudential split seen across the whole book. — connects to: Corporal punishment rates in Muslim countries exceed those of non-Muslim populations — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 3716; Muslim scholars reformed doctrine while lay practice still reproduces inherited corporal punishment — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 3725; Anti-corporal-punishment movements emerged independently within each religious tradition — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 4209 (+4 more)

Broader Connections