Multiple identity memberships reduce intergroup loyalty polarization and tension

Evidence

One may assume that in the context of multiple categorization, individuals depend less on a single category to satisfy the psychological need of “belonging” than they do in the context of single categorization. As a consequence, they should be less likely to polarize their loyalties along any specific in-group category, which then holds lower potential for intergroup tensions (see Brewer, 1993). This, of course, relies on the multiple categories considered being of relatively equal salience, a precondition that may not always be given, especially in situations that give rise to threat perceptions surrounding identity and group membership. — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 571 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Pluralist fragmentation triggers a compensatory search for secure identity. — David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: An…, 1912; Distinguishing identification dimensions improves prediction of intergroup outcomes — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt: Modes…, 143; Multiple balanced group memberships reduce intergroup hostility potential — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 571 (+6 more)

Broader Connections

• Multiple balanced group memberships reduce intergroup hostility potential #corroborates (0.95) — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 571