Movements admit excluded groups legally without surrendering control of incorporation criteria.

Evidence

What the movements ended up doing in each instance, not insignificantly but also revealingly, was to admit, all too often begrudgingly, those hitherto excluded into social arrangements and conditions the definitions of which continued to be dominated by those who had held racial power in the first place. This nominal admission was, for the most part, principally legal. Political, social, and cultural recognition and access were much less compelling and so more ambivalent. What changed little or less so were the criteria of incorporation and the defining power over those criteria. … Likewise, though in different ways and to different degrees, with former colonial or segregated subjects and apartheid’s discarded. Equal access to unequal resources and possibilities from positions of unequal preparation and power ultimately entails a third-class ticket to nowhere. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 114

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Antiracist movements admitted the excluded without ceding defining power over criteria — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 114

Broader Connections

• Antiracist movements admitted the excluded without ceding defining power over criteria #corroborates (0.95) — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 114