Most scarcity is socially defined rather than intrinsic to resources

Evidence

The pursuit of capitalist accumulation could not be carried out indefinitely, since it is not self-sustaining in terms of resources. While some resources are intrinsically scarce, most are not, in the sense that, except for the basic requirements of bodily existence, “scarcity” is relative to socially defined needs and to the demands of specific lifestyles. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 387

Categorization

  • XREF: Resonates with the reader’s broader interest in how socially constructed frameworks (like scarcity, or institutional roles) shape individual action — parallels the constructed quality of Stevens’s butler identity. — connects to: Poverty is defined by social reaction, not by material deficiency — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 444; Scarcity of savings stems from scarcity of loans, not vice versa; Resource value and defensibility are relative to each species’ perspective — Emlen, Douglas J, Animal Weapons_ The Evolution of Battle, 203 (+6 more)
  • DEFINE: Clarifies Giddens’s argument that post-scarcity is meaningful because scarcity itself is largely a social construction rather than a natural limit.

Broader Connections