Modern trust is vested in abstract capacities, not individuals

Evidence

Trust is therefore involved in a fundamental way with the institutions of modernity. Trust here is vested, not in individuals, but in abstract capacities. Anyone who uses monetary tokens does so on the presumption that others, whom she or he never meets, honour their value. But it is money as such which is trusted, not only, or even primarily, the persons with whom particular transactions are carried out. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 72

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly maps onto the reader’s stated project: Stevens places trust in the ‘greatness’ of Lord Darlington’s household as an abstract institution rather than in persons. This is the theoretical crux the reader wants. — connects to: Modern society needs non-personal trust beyond what individuals provide; Trust in abstract systems is tacit routine, not conscious choice. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 222; Pre-modern trust is anchored in local place rather than abstract systems. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 245 (+11 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: This is the load-bearing distinction in the reader’s entire thesis — the abstract-capacity trust that makes possible both institutional efficiency and, when the institution lacks moral grounding, total ethical abdication.

Broader Connections