Misrecognition is a cultural and institutional injustice rooted in representation and communication.

Evidence

In the social and cultural realm, the key to understanding recognitional injustice lies in understanding the social norms, language, and mores that mediate our relation between those who are denigrated and so less well-off in the scheme of justice. The argument is that misor malrecognition is a cultural and institutional form of injustice. This type of cultural injustice is ‘rooted in patterns of representation, interpretation, and communication’ (Fraser 1998: 7). In confronting the injustices of cultural domination, nonrecognition, and lack of respect, various movements focus on remedies based in cultural, symbolic, and, ultimately, institutional change. The point is to examine the range of social and cultural values and practices that impede the full recognition of a group as an accepted member of the moral and political community. There are both sociocultural and political elements to this type of recognition. — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 67

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sharp definition of recognitional injustice as cultural/institutional rooted in patterns of representation — pairs with the earlier misrecognition-due-to-misdistribution claims.
  • XREF: connects to: Fraser reframes misrecognition as institutional status subordination rather than psychological harm — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 76; Misdistribution stems from prior failures of social and cultural recognition. — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 61; Group misrecognition produces distributive injustice through social structures and institutions. — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 64 (+10 more)

Broader Connections