Mimetic realism and author authenticity jointly underwrite truth claims of Muslim memoirs

Evidence

It is not my intention to contest what seems to me the incontrovertible fact that these texts form part of a broader current animus against Muslims and their culture. My point is, rather, that each text stakes its truth claims in part on the supposed objectivity guaranteed by the techniques of literary mimesis—that is to say, they create believable, three-dimensional worlds for the characters to inhabit and in which readers can immerse themselves—and in part on the expectations engendered by the rules of the genre to which the text belongs. These features are then underwritten, as in the cases of Reading Lolita in Tehran and The Kite Runner, by the supposed authenticity of the author as a spokesperson hailing from that region of the globe under scrutiny. — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 214

Categorization

  • XREF: The mechanism by which realist form converts into factual authority is exactly what the reader needs to test against Hamid’s and Naqvi’s narrative techniques. — connects to: Genre and mimesis condition how literary truth-claims are received — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 212; Misery memoirs ground truth claims in mimesis, genre rules, and author’s regional authenticity; The Muslim misery memoir genre gains authenticity precisely by reinforcing Western moral claims — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 67 (+6 more)
  • yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Genre and mimesis condition how literary truth-claims are received — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 212; Misery memoirs ground truth claims in mimesis, genre rules, and author’s regional authenticity; The Muslim misery memoir genre gains authenticity precisely by reinforcing Western moral claims — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 67 (+6 more)

Broader Connections