Military euphemisms recruit language to obscure the reality of killing

Evidence

Another set of sanitizers had to do with military operations. An ā€œoperational pauseā€ occurred when a military mission bogged down. With irony, war was called ā€œassertive disarmament.ā€ Weapons were ā€œassets.ā€ Pinpoint bombing was ā€œdiscriminative deterrenceā€ A ā€œhunter-killer teamā€ or ā€œspecial mission unitā€ was a military assassination squad. Individuals contracted out by private companies as security guards and armed escorts were called ā€œmercenariesā€ by the soldiers but ā€œcivilian contractorsā€ or ā€œprivate military contractorsā€ by the military establishment (McKenna & Johnson, 2012). Their employment was called ā€œgreenbackingā€ (What is a euphemism? n.d.). — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement, 2368

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the broader moral disengagement framework of the book and to Orwell’s newspeak concept of language as political control. — connects to: Euphemistic language like ā€˜collateral damage’ severs accountability for harm — Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom,…, 1281; The euphemism ā€˜depleted’ masks uranium’s radioactive and chemical threat in munitions — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism…, 603; Euphemism is structurally necessary to sell wars in democracies — Rob Nixon, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism…, 665 (+2 more)
  • SEED: Could seed an essay cataloging contemporary euphemisms across industries (prison, tech layoffs, medicine) as moral-disengagement devices.