Mehmed Ali’s expansion policy cost him essential British support

Evidence

For his part, Mehmed Ali was aware that his continued existence depended on British support. This support could have been secured if he had confined himself to Egypt; his expansionary policy, however, was necessarily harmful to Britain’s interests. This he seems to have realized but it also appears that he had managed to fool himself into thinking that if he were allowed to annex Syria and Mesopotamia in addition to Egypt, he would then be able – together with Persia and the Sultan in Istanbul – to pose a united front that would repulse any Russian move against India. This, as was shown above, Palmerston found to be unnecessary and too risky. — Khaled Fahmy, All the Pasha_s Men_ Mehmed Ali, his…, 1584

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • XREF: Ties directly to the Great Game and Russian expansion fears that shaped 19th-century Near East policy.