Medieval polemicists hoped rational argument could unify the faiths

Evidence

Most authors valued very highly any opportunity of giving this impression, and would have justified their doing so, could they have been sufficiently candid with themselves, on the ground that what deserved to be effective would be so. This might occasionally be made nearly explicit. In the minds of some intellectual leaders the idea of showing forth the truth of Christianity was strong; thus, in the public dispute with the Jewish Rabbi Nachman, which did indeed take place, the communiqué asserted that there was no question of discussing the truth of the Christian faith, but only of making the truth of that faith manifest. This is no doubt why the Christian and Jewish accounts do not altogether agree. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1470 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Some Christian thinkers knew arguments must rest on reason yet assumed Muslim premises; Medieval thinkers saw all faiths as destined for eventual reunion in one church; Economic mystification parallels medieval theology and requires a grassroots Reformation. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 1813 (+13 more)

Broader Connections

• Medieval polemic debates aimed to display rather than test Christian truth #complicates (0.84) — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 1470