Medieval polemic condemned the Qur’an’s religious pluralism as mere evasion of disputation

Evidence

Thus in the chapter e/kaferin, this is word for word what he says: O profane ones, I do not adore what you adore, nor do you adore what I adore, and I do not adore what you adore, and you do not adore what I adore. Your Law is for you and my Law is for me. But every heretic can say as much, in order to cut short a matter of which the truth is under examination. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 345

Categorization

• XREF: Ricoldo reads the Quraysh-era toleration verse — ‘Your law for you, my law for me’ — as sophistry rather than pluralism; echoes how modern critics render Muslim claims to coexist as bad-faith. Relevance to vault cluster.