Masks let guilt be displayed without exposing faces

Evidence

Prisoners in the panopticon would wear masks, the grimaces of the masks expressing the gravity of their offences: the prisoners would thus, as it were, stage their own guilt. They would wear these masks on ‘the only occasion on which their eyes will have to encounter the public eye’, that is, during the divine service attended by outside worshippers. Since on this occasion the prisoners would know that they were exposed to public gaze, this ‘perpetual pillory’ could in time harden them and render them insensitive, ultimately impeding their reformation. — Jeremy Bentham, The Panopticon Writings, 20

Categorization

  • XREF: ‘Guilt pilloried in the abstract’ without exposing the guilty — a stark contrast to Oceania’s public spectacles, which demand real faces and real bodies be liquidated on screen. Orwell reverses Bentham’s anonymizing logic. — connects to: Formality’s mask grants freedom from full personal responsibility for one’s appearance — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 375; Votive masks prove the ritual was transformative rather than punitive — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 329; Veiling functions for converts as emancipatory protection from sexual objectification. — Margaret Hodson, Baby Jihad, 45 (+4 more)

Broader Connections