Market-dynamics siting outcomes remain racist once housing discrimination is factored in

Evidence

Let us assume that the current physical distribution of hazardous waste facilities could be attributed to the location of older facilities in neighborhoods that subsequently became populated by poor people of color—that “market dynamics” produced the racially disparate outcomes found in some communities. Even accepting that the siting process is not responsible for all racially disparate outcomes in environmental hazard distribution and that instead the demographics of a given community with a waste facility have changed over time, it is not easy to dismiss the notion that racism or injustice produced the results. If existing racially discriminatory processes in the housing market, for example, contribute to the distribution of environmental hazards, or of people of color, then it is entirely appropriate to call such outcomes unjust, and even racist. — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up, 336

Categorization

  • XREF: Pays off the ch7 claim that housing-market discrimination makes free-market choices illusory and that market explanations lack conclusive support. — connects to: Race predicts environmental hazard exposure better than income does — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental…, 294; Housing-market discrimination makes purportedly free market choices illusory — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental…, 317; Environmental racism is a symptom of broader ongoing racial discrimination — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental…, 338 (+13 more)

Broader Connections