Marcuse argued individual happiness requires the universal attainment of positive freedom

Evidence

Whatever the means to achieve true happiness might he, it could only be reached when freedom was also universally attained. “The reality of happiness,” Marcuse wrote, “is the reality of freedom as the self-determination of liberated humanity in its common struggle with nature.” And since freedom was synonymous with the realization of rationality, “in their completed form both, happiness and reason, coincide.” 60 What Marcuse was advocating here was that con vergence of particular and general interests usually known as “positive freedom.” 81 Individual happiness was one moment in the totality of positive freedom; reason was the other. — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination, 238

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Introduces ‘positive freedom’ as the Frankfurt School’s concept of happiness as convergence of individual and universal reason.
  • XREF: The positive-freedom concept contrasts with Berlin’s negative freedom and connects to Habermas’s later emancipatory interest. — connects to: Bourgeois renunciation means surviving only by sacrificing full happiness — Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 63; Marcuse argued bourgeois notions of freedom actually sanctioned existing authority — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 424; Individual freedom is achieved only through the freedom of others — Simone de Beauvoir, The Ethics of Ambiguity, 144 (+13 more)

Broader Connections