Man-controlled burning can still yield a natural ecosystem

Evidence

It can be argued that since man would control the times and places of ignition, and the size of the burns, the system would be “unnatural.” But there would be no direct control over local fire behavior or effects, over sources of plant propagules, or over other variables that determine vegetative or animal responses. Philosophically man would have some control, but only through conscious reintroduction of the very environmental factor that shaped the primeval vegetation. To the extent that fire frequency, intensity, and timing duplicated the natural regime, the effects should be natural. — Miron L. Heinselman, Fire in the Virgin Forests of the…, 477

Categorization

  • XREF: A live tension for the polyad: the Wilderness Act legal text is quoted here — ties to the law/institutions thread exactly as staged. — connects to: Restoring the natural regime means burning roughly 4,200 Canoe Area acres yearly — Miron L. Heinselman, Fire in the Virgin Forests of the…, 466; Historic burns of 100,000 acres can no longer be allowed in the Canoe Area — Miron L. Heinselman, Fire in the Virgin Forests of the…, 472; Fire is an intrinsic ecosystem component, not an unnatural disturbance, in the Canoe Area. — Miron L. Heinselman, Fire in the Virgin Forests of the…, 426 (+9 more)

Broader Connections