Luther conflated the Pope and the Turk as twin Anti-Christs despite thin resemblance

Evidence

Luther constantly named the Pope and the Turk together, though rather arbitrarily, since he did not usually insist on specific points of resemblance: Turca et Papa tn forma religionis nihil differunt aut variant, nisi in ceremoniis. The one corrupted the ritual of the Old, the other that of the New Testament. Luther seems to have feared a coalition of his enemies, ‘an alliance of the Papists with the Turk … for unbelievable is the malice of Satan’. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 2438 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Luther, like many other Protestant reformers, invoked negative images of Islam not only to garner support for a war against the Turks but also to attack his opponents. … Luther was quite fond of tarring both Islam and Catholicism with the same brush. He often used the language of the “Antichrist” when referring to both Muhammad and the pope, though eventually he concluded that the title was more deserving of the pope. Still, Muhammad and the pope were two sides of the same coin: — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 154 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Luther and the Reformers saw the Turk as a sharper Antichrist than the Pope; Luther equated the Papacy and Islam as the twin corrupters of Christian ritual — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 2438; Luther weaponized images of Islam to attack Catholicism as well as Turks — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 154 (+16 more)

Broader Connections