Low- and high-frequency binaural brainstem pathways prefer opposite interaural phase ranges

Evidence

Evoked responses to the intermediate IPM rate (6.8 Hz; Fig. 2 ) became steady state at the same rate as the IPM, and so we term this response the IPM-FR. … Responses obtained at 6.8 Hz IPM rate were maximal for IPDs spanning ±45–±90°, whereas responses obtained at 13.4 Hz IPM rate increased monotonically with increasing IPD. — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 2949 (#expands, via linked claim)

The model assumes devices or channels that are tuned to particular interaural delays. These devices, which exist only for frequencies below 1500 Hz, are assumed to be arrays of channels each tuned to a different characteristic interaural delay. Each channel then acts as an interaural delay filter. It transmits whatever signal arrives at its characteristic delay without attenuation, but attenuates more and more those signals that arrive with delays that are increasingly different from the characteristic delay of the channel. — Professor Dr.-Ing. Hugo Fastl, Professor Dr.-Ing. Eberhard, Psychoacoustics- Facts and Models, 1680 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: MSO and LSO neurons have opposite optimal interaural phase responses — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 2947; High-frequency interaural phase differences are ambiguous about azimuth location; The best interaural phase deviation for evoking neural responses depends on modulation rate — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 2949 (+3 more)

Broader Connections