Lo-fi soundscapes erase the distinction between signal and noise

Evidence

Of the four general definitions, probably the most satisfactory is still “unwanted sound.” This makes noise a subjective term. One man’s music may be another man’s noise. — Schafer, Murray R, The Soundscape- Our Sonic Environment…, 614 (#expands, via linked claim)

Two new techniques were introduced: the discovery of packaging and storing techniques for sound and the splitting of sounds from their original contexts—which I call schizophonia. The benefits of the electroacoustic transmission and reproduction of sound are well enough celebrated, but they should not obscure the fact that precisely at the time hi-fi was being engineered, the world soundscape was slipping into an all-time lo-fi condition. — Schafer, Murray R, The Soundscape- Our Sonic Environment…, 319 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim
  • XREF: connects to: Figure, ground, and field map onto signal, keynote, and soundscape — Schafer, Murray R, The Soundscape- Our Sonic Environment…, 501; Hi-fi and lo-fi soundscapes differ by whether individual sounds survive masking — Schafer, Murray R, The Soundscape- Our Sonic Environment…, 151; The splitting of sounds from their sources coincided with the soundscape’s decline into lo-fi — Schafer, Murray R, The Soundscape- Our Sonic Environment…, 319 (+13 more)

Broader Connections