Llull felt his universal Art was neglected in favor of lucrative knowledge
Evidence
Llullās later works reļ¬ect both his continuing efforts to adapt his missionary strategy to a changing world and a mounting sense that his work is unappreciated and hence ultimately futile. He laments in De ļ¬ne, āI cannot make the above-mentioned Arts take root in this world, rather for this I am neglected, since all rush to acquire pompous or lucrative knowledge. And I languish for the public good which I see in the Arts, and I live in sadness in pain, wandering over the world.ā In 1311 Llull composed his Phantasticus: he presents himself on his way to the council of Vienne, which he would try to convince to adopt a modiļ¬ed version of the plan laid out in De ļ¬ne. On his way he meets a successful, worldly archdeacon who, upon learning who his traveling companion is, exclaims: āRamon, I have often heard about you; they say you are really crazy [phantasticus].ā ā John V. Tolan, Saracens, 1349
Categorization
- SEED: The self-presentation of a scholar as āphantasticusā who ālanguishes for the public goodā while āall rush to acquire pompous or lucrative knowledgeā is a ready-made meditation on the fate of unfashionable intellectual projects vs. careerist learning.