Lippmann’s Good Society accepted much of the New Deal despite attacking planning.

Evidence

In an incredulous overview in the Yale Review, Ralph Barton Perry observed that “Mr. Lippmann could not very well have attacked the New Deal directly because, item by item, he accepts the greater part of it.” — Angus Burgin, The Great Persuasion, 159

Categorization

• XREF: Contrast with later Mont Pèlerin Society positions and standard histories that place early free-market revival squarely against New Deal intervention. — connects to: Lippmann’s anti-planning stance actually accepted most New Deal policies; Lippmann’s Good Society framework shaped Hayek’s later political philosophy — Angus Burgin, The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free…, 163; Lippmann’s 1937 Good Society launched the neoliberal program against Depression-era orthodoxy — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making…, 105

Broader Connections

• Lippmann’s anti-planning stance actually accepted most New Deal policies #corroborates (1.00)
• Lippmann’s Good Society framework shaped Hayek’s later political philosophy #expands (0.75) — Angus Burgin, The Great Persuasion, 163
• Lippmann’s 1937 Good Society launched the neoliberal program against Depression-era orthodoxy #expands (0.70) — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin, 105