Limited German publication of Critical Theory texts stemmed from Horkheimer’s hesitation, not publisher resistance.

Evidence

This lack of success was clearly due not so much to publishers’ resistance to critical texts as to the strange division of labour between Maus, acting as an enthusiastic literary agent, and a hesitant Horkheimer. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 417

Categorization

• XREF: Connects to the recurring pattern in this book of Horkheimer’s institutional risk-aversion (cf. his efforts to market the Institute to business and authorities). — connects to: Horkheimer’s own reluctance, not publisher resistance, blocked postwar German publication of the Institute’s works. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1682; Horkheimer avoided new German publishing involvements while Adorno published freely. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 417
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Horkheimer’s own reluctance, not publisher resistance, blocked postwar German publication of the Institute’s works. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1682; Horkheimer avoided new German publishing involvements while Adorno published freely. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 417

Broader Connections

• Horkheimer’s own reluctance, not publisher resistance, blocked postwar German publication of the Institute’s works. #corroborates (0.98) — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 1682