Lifestreaming is distinguished from personal diaries by networked public readability

Evidence

Tracking one’s personal information is not a new concept. Diarist Samuel Pepys recorded details of his daily life for ten years. Samuel Johnson and Benjamin Franklin were both compulsive self-trackers: Franklin kept a chart chronicling his daily adherence to thirteen self-identified virtues such as frugality, chastity, and humility. Keeping a diary, even a very detailed one, is a fairly common practice today. Former Senator Bob Graham, for instance, keeps color-coded daily logs of his activities that are so meticulous that they were admissible as evidence in government investigations. And tracking food and exercise, or simply counting calories, is a common precept of weight-loss programs. What makes the lifestream different from its paper predecessors is that lifestreamers use the internet to make this information widely readable. — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update, 545

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the key distinction between old self-tracking practices and the modern lifestream: the internet-mediated public readability.
  • XREF: Connects to Foucault’s technologies of the self and to Franklin’s virtue-tracking as a historical antecedent of quantified self culture. — connects to: Lifestreaming is continuous self-sharing to an invisible networked audience — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 538; Lifestreaming audiences differ from networked publics by spanning multiple sites — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 551; Daily private journaling tracks individual listening progress over time. — Pauline Oliveros, Deep Listening, 109 (+5 more)

Broader Connections