Liberal universalism is reasserted as defense against Islamic terrorism.

Evidence

This exchange encapsulates all that has gone before and puts Shahid (and Kureishi) in the company of those writers who in the days after 9/11 were to reassert the liberal universalism of the Western literary tradition as a main line of defense against Islamic terrorism. Here, I would draw attention to the way in which Shahid’s reply underwrites the novel’s broader disavowal of positions that are seen as a threat to foundational cultural values. … The rearticulation of the notion of an unfettered, free-floating artist, responsible to no one but himself, is juxtaposed against a kind of fanaticism in the Other that is central to contemporary Islamophobia: the herd mentality, the absence of critical thought, the propensity for violence. — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 178

Categorization

Category: Contrarian or Surprising Claims

  • SEED: The libral-universalism-as-defense move gives an essay angle: how supposedly anti-Islamophobic liberal novels can secretly reinforce the herd-mentality stereotype of Muslims.
  • XREF: The ‘free-floating artist responsible to no one’ ideal is exactly the test to run on Changez and Darashikoh — do they claim no standpoint, or a contested one?

Broader Connections