Late modern and postmodern architecture differ on allusion to the past

Evidence

His most significant move was to distinguish, early on, ‘late modern’ from ‘post-modern’ architecture. Dropping the claim that modernism had collapsed in the early seventies, Jencks conceded that its dynamic still survived, if in paroxysmic form, as an aesthetic of technological prowess increasingly detached from functional pretexts — but still impervious to the play of retrospect and allusion that marked postmodernism: Foster and Rogers as against Moore and Graves. This was the architectural equivalent of the literature championed by Hassan — ultra-modernism. — Perry Anderson, The Origins of Postmodernity, 61

Categorization

  • DEFINE: The late-modern vs. post-modern distinction is central to the periodization dispute — needed to understand Jameson’s own periodization of the cultural dominant.
  • XREF: Directly parallels Jameson’s distinction between residual modernism and postmodernism proper — the exact periodization argument this book is framing. — connects to: Postmodern space emerges only from the dialectical collision of old and new architectural forms — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 311; Modernist architecture aggressively repudiated the old city while postmodern buildings complacently coexist with it — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 139; Postmodern architecture deliberately packages an older structure inside a new, alien skin — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 286 (+4 more)

Broader Connections