Language derives from an authorless original formation, an original plasticity
Evidence
StoĂen means âto bump againstâ, âto stumble acrossâ, âto fall upon somethingâ in a metaphorical sense. One stumbles onto language, onto that part of it which falls to oneâs share (qui vous Ă©choit) and which is âfound thereâ as something to be picked up. Language is a stamped and hallmarked material (gestempelt), that sends us back to an original, authorless formation, an original plasticity. The naturalness of language allows us to experience an immemorial past. â Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 1158
Categorization
- DEFINE: Malabou anchors plasticity itself in Hegelâs philology of language as authorless, stamped material.
- XREF: Connects to the readerâs core project of grounding brain plasticity in Hegelâs concept of an original, pre-subjective formation. â connects to: Language is an authorless plastic formation through which speakers encounter an immemorial past â Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,âŠ, 1158; Plasticity manifests as the genuine production of new forms of discoursivity; Plasticity is understood as a verbal and conceptual schema
Broader Connections
- Language is an authorless plastic formation through which speakers encounter an immemorial past
#corroborates(0.90) â Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 1158 - Plasticity manifests as the genuine production of new forms of discoursivity
#expands(0.75) - Plasticity is understood as a verbal and conceptual schema
#expands(0.70)