Koyré and Kojève read Hegel’s future as primary against Heidegger
Evidence
It concerns thus two readings proposed and put forth in France, with the influence we know, by two thinkers who were neither French nor German, but of Russian origin. Both of these thinkers, Koyré and Kojève, recognized, contrary to Heidegger, the ‘prevalence’ or the ‘primacy’ of the future on the present in the Jena Lectures. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 98
Categorization
Category: Connection Points
- XREF: Directly relevant to the book’s already-extracted thread that Heidegger reads Hegel’s silence on the future as time’s essence being past — these Russian readers are the documented counter-position Malabou stages against Heidegger.
Related
- Koyré and Kojève’s future-priority reading of Hegel ends in admitted impasse (similarity 0.91)
- French philosophy’s Hegel-Heidegger horizon was forged jointly by Koyré and Kojève (similarity 0.83)
- Prior interpreters declared Hegel’s two futures irreconcilably contradictory (similarity 0.83)
- Denying a philosopher’s concept of the future doubles as denying that philosophy’s own future (similarity 0.81)
- Hegel never reconciled the future’s chronological and logical-conceptual senses (similarity 0.80)
- For Heidegger authentic future is time itself, not a moment of it (similarity 0.80)
- Hegel’s thought allegedly renounced all future by thinking time itself. (similarity 0.79)