Jameson describes postmodern life but rarely calibrates the political effects of movements

Evidence

If we look at Postmodernism, what we find are unforgettable etchings of the quality of life in this historical form, with ‘its internal quotient of misery and the determinate potentiality of bodily and spiritual transfiguration it also affords, or conquers’. But of calibration of the ‘political effects of cultural movements’, there is significantly less. The New Social Movements do figure, as a now standard topos, in Jameson’s survey of the postmodern, where they are viewed with sympathy, but also a wary caution against inflated claims made on their behalf. But their invocation is without detail or differentiation, perhaps because they are not in the first instance — as their name implies — cultural movements stricto sensu at all. — Perry Anderson, The Origins of Postmodernity, 301

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly extends the distinction between ‘monitoring’ and ‘adjudicating’ culture that carries through the whole chapter and echoes Anderson’s charge that the aesthetic/economic pairing forecloses the political. — connects to: Jameson’s three-fold stance divides taste, analysis, and political evaluation of art — Perry Anderson, The Origins of Postmodernity, 300; Calling new social movements postmodern is a tautology without critical force; The account of postmodernism originally lacked any social agency — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 24 (+8 more)

Broader Connections