Jabotinsky framed the sole political alternatives as withdrawal or colonial force.

Evidence

“Zionist colonisation must either stop, or else proceed regardless of the native population. Which means that it can proceed and develop only under the protection of a power that is independent of the native population—behind an iron wall, which the native population cannot breach.” The only difference between “our ‘militarists’ and our ‘vegetarians’ ” is that “the first prefer that the iron wall should consist of Jewish soldiers,” while the second “are content that they should be British.” — Wael Hallaq, Restating Orientalism, 391

Categorization

• ADDENDUM: Directly supports the ‘On Sacrifice’ essay’s theme of state violence as stabilizing structure — here the Iron Wall explicitly excludes native consent by design.