International court rulings alone do not end corporal punishment practices

Evidence

This gap between the judgment and compliance is itself instructive. The Court held the practice to be a violation of the Convention. The practice continued. What eventually stopped it was not a further court order but a combination of sustained advocacy, the threat of continued proceedings, and the eventual shift in Isle of Man public and legislative opinion. The legal ruling was necessary. It was not sufficient. — , The Rod and the Child, 9156

Categorization

  • SEED: A usable angle: the limits of legal rulings in changing entrenched punitive practices — applies beyond birching to many human-rights enforcement gaps.
  • XREF: connects to: Legal prohibition alone does not reduce household corporal punishment practice — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 4749; Corporal punishment of children in South Africa is now legally assault without exception. — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 4770; Buddhist doctrine has not measurably reduced corporal punishment in Mahāyāna countries — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 3956 (+9 more)

Broader Connections