Instrumentarian power transforms the market into a project of total certainty, unlike totalitarian possession

Evidence

I argue that instrumentarianism is an unprecedented species of power that has defied comprehension in part because it has been subjected to the ā€œhorseless-carriageā€ syndrome. Instrumentarian power has been viewed through the old lenses of totalitarianism, obscuring what is different and dangerous. Totalitarianism was a transformation of the state into a project of total possession. Instrumentarianism and its materialization in Big Other signal the transformation of the market into a project of total certainty, an undertaking that is unimaginable outside the digital milieu and the logic of surveillance capitalism. — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 71

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines ā€˜instrumentarian power’ and ā€˜Big Other’ as new species of power distinguished from totalitarianism by their aim: total certainty rather than total possession.
  • XREF: The horseless-carriage/syndrome point that new technologies get misread through old categories parallels critiques of seeing surveillance through 20th-century privacy frameworks only. — connects to: Instrumentarianism is a market project unlike totalitarianism’s political project. — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1142; Instrumentarian power aims at total certainty through a market project — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1699; Instrumentarian power differs fundamentally from twentieth-century totalitarianism — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1121 (+2 more)

Broader Connections