Injustice is experienced simultaneously across distribution, recognition, participation, and functioning.

Evidence

While it is convenient to offer discussions of equity, recognition, participation, and capabilities in distinct sections, above, one very rarely sees movement groups discuss one of these dimensions of justice in isolation. Groups integrate these notions of justice, and while a group may call for equal distribution of environmental risks, it will also complain about the lack of recognition of community members, the lack of participatory opportunities, and/or the decimation of community functioning. As in the discussion of justice on the theoretical level, these notions of justice in the environmental justice movement are thoroughly integrated in practice. Conceptions of justice, and, more importantly, the experiences of injustice, are experienced in numerous ways at once. β€” David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 264

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the crux claim of the whole book’s analytic tool β€” that the three (or four) justice dimensions are integrated, not rival, in lived experience. Reader should carry it to every other reading in the polyad. β€” connects to: Distribution alone is incomplete because recognition, participation, and capability gaps also cause injustice. β€” David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 169; The environmental justice movement’s founding principles integrated justice dimensions from its earliest moments. β€” David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 265; A single environmental conflict instantiates all four justice dimensions for humans and nature β€” David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 587 (+9 more)
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source

Broader Connections